I really appreciate the input and the time it takes to answer these posts. Thank you to those answering on the 3 pt vs frame mount question. Does yours have some sort of 3pt arm locking fixture or does it just flop around?. Paul, you sound like you use yours a lot. I'm wondering if the guys that get good results with the 3pt hoes also have some sort of attachment to keep the 3pt arms stable. I need the flexibility of being able to change implements in a couple of minutes, and I've been very happy with my three-point, and I'd buy another in a second. Not saying it's not an issue, just haven't seen it on my application. I have never seen any indication of undue stress anywhere on the tractor. I'd like to have a buck back for every tooth I've worn out and replaced on that thing. I get into rocky soil, ledge outcroppings, pin gravel, you name it. I use it HARD! Hard enough to have cracked a couple of weldments over the last 8 years or so. ![]() I have a Woods 650 three-point on my JD 750. I have a #7 on a 755 and it can bounce the tractor around pretty well. Having said that, I do have to remind myself to check the torque on my tractor's case bolts before I mount my 3ph hoe this year. There's also a neighbour with a sizable Case loader/hoe, and there's always the pro with the tracked hi-hoe. As it stands, the 3ph hoe does most of my work. Many of the older sub-frame mounts are a pain and really do compromise other uses of the tractor. Sub-frame mounts are fairly specific to a tractor, and the newer fancy mounts may not be available for my 1710. Actually, I'm not sure I have the alternative of a sub-frame mount for my mid-80's Ford. If I was going to spend my life on a tractor mounted hoe or do repeated heavy-duty tasks, I'd probably get a sub-frame mount, but then I might just get a dedicated hoe/loader instead. My hoe is somewhat undersized for the tractor, and I use it in moderation. I'm also aware of the tractor frame stress issues that are especially pertinent to 3ph hoes. Myself, I'm of the convenient, cheap, occasional and fairly easy use 3ph-mount flavour. If you check the archives and questions remain, I'm sure a post will get you some good responses. The archives should turn up probably more than you'd want to read on the subject. 3 point units are considerably less expensive than frame mount, but are they worth it in the long run, or would I be better off spending the extra money for the frame mount? The high-productivity sweep also exerts less draft than Tru-Width and major competitors, reducing engine horsepower requirements and diesel consumption.I am in the market for a backhoe for my JD 955 and have looked at both the JD #7 hoe (frame mount) and the bush hog 3 (3 point mount). Tru-Width sweeps with the Perma-Loc adapter can seamlessly move the high-productivity sweeps. The high-productivity Perma-Loc style sweeps use the current Perma-Loc adapter for 47-degree curved standard N237614. They fit all 47-degree standards with 44.5-mm (1.75-in.) hole spacing and 11.1-mm (7/16-in.) that currently take Tru-Width sweeps, both John Deere and other makes. The high-productivity sweeps for the John Deere H500 Air Hoe Drill comes in 178-mm (7-in.), 229-mm (9-in.), and 254-mm (10-in.), and 305-mm (12-in.) widths, both in the bolt-on and the Perma-Loc version. Wear life is longer than Tru-Widthâ„¢ sweeps and equal or better than competitors.Retains its shape and width during its wear life.Easily moves through tougher and higher volume residue. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |